.

.

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

The Realist Report with John Friend 2014.07.22





On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Delcroix of Outside Radio. Del and I will be discussing a variety of subjects, particularly focusing on the role that the Jewish controlled mass media plays in maintaining and perpetuating Jewish tyranny and control.

Below are relevant links for this program:

John-Friend.net
The Realist Report (TalkShoe)
The Realist Report (YouTube)
A View From The Bog




Download

9 comments:

  1. September Clues Addendum - Simon Shack

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD_IgCKpNrY

    This is basically every video Shack has made post-2008 (the date of the latest revision of the original September Clues) in one place, playing one-after-the-other.

    ~ Negentropic MK I

    ReplyDelete
  2. dis-traction – that which prevents traction

    When a new PsyOp claiming death-&-destruction turns up on your door-step via the media, and internet sleuths of the more advanced Simon-Shack variety have found reliable methods of identifying the falseness of the imagery information transmitted to you by this single most untrustworthy and controlled source in the world, this means that you can throw that particular PsyOp claiming its validity based on fraudulent evidence in the garbage, shit-can it forever along with any fear and trauma conditioning attached to it, and move on with more important matters, no longer dis-tracted but GAINING traction.

    This is because there is a still respected principle of Roman law called:

    falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

    false in one particular, false in everything.

    “This principle of Roman law is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. The concept is that if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says. This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: it discredits the rest of their testimony. The object behind the principle is to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.”

    link to everything2.com

    Notice, it’s falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, and NOT verum in uno, verum in omnibus

    or

    true in one particular, true in everything

    the backwards method of many conspiracy hobbyists, LOVED by all con-artists and liars and completely inadmissible in any proper court.

    Loss of traction actually happens when those with the wherewhital to be leaders are wittingly or unwittingly led by people like Alex Jones and Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith and Christopher Bollyn and Alan Sabrosky and Mark Glenn and Michael Collins Piper and Jeff Rense and Prostink and many others to be distrustful of WHO did the ‘false-flag’ operation but fully accepting of the HOW, which always incorporates a fear-mongering death-&-destruction meme.

    The answer of the people wittingly or unwittingly pushing the fear-&-paranoia-memes was always: they lied about WHO did it, we have now figured out WHO did it, the HOW is unimportant, never suspecting that maybe the perps did not care if people speculated on WHO did it and pointed fingers as long as the HOW was kept obscure and they could repeat the conditioning of billions needed to be safe-and-secure in their rule. In other words, a version of Ben Stein's "I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them." They don't care if all of the world thinks THEY did it, as long as they get to keep doing it and remain untouchable by the peons they're ruling.

    ~ Negentropic MK II


    ReplyDelete
  3. The troofers never suspected that the HOW would maybe show them that these big-bad evil banksters with trillions that never gave a second thought to starting wars and famines that killed millions didn’t do much of anything at all on 9-11 except PSYCHOLOGICALLY manipulate billions via Big Lies in IMAGERY that also continued the very same FEAR-MEME (via the imagery which they still trusted although they had long ago rejected the verbal transmissions), along somewhat different and more ‘sleuth-friendly’ paths in themselves. That in itself is so hard to believe that it serves as an impregnable buffer against most people understanding the HOW of their own manipulations.

    The question that always comes forth from conditioned paranoids whose egos as ‘hard-men’ are bitch-slapped by the realization that they may have been fooled by nothing more elaborate or ‘real-life’ than friggin' special FX and actors in Hollywood productions is “Are you saying that they would have a problem killing 3000 people or 28 people when they never had a problem killing millions in wars and man-made famines and whatnot in the past?.”

    Well, the answer is both YES and NO. They obviously DO have a problem with killing 3000 people on 9-11 (or 28 people on Sandy Hook) because aside from the false-testimony of boo-hoo-hoo-on-cue ass-clown actors there is simply no proof that they did die (maybe some people due to asbestos poisoning, but not even one body or valid last address of residence for the the supposed 3000 on 9-11, for instance, and absurdly fake images of KING KONG men supposedly jumping from the buildings and others out of metal spandrells)



    and they obviously DON’T have a problem with killing way more than 3000 people because the many wars (with many producable corpses) have proven that, not to mention the myriad of ‘slow-kills’ of both body and soul operative in most human societies, especially our European-based one, at any one time. The cancer-racket alone kills over a million people a year worldwide (supposedly, statistics are NOT immune to manipulation by media-owners either, but almost everyone knows somebody that died from cancer or rather the racket attached to its ‘treatment’).

    -- Negentropic MK III

    ReplyDelete
  4. THE KING KONG MAN - Simon Shack

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2374833#p2374833

    KING KONG MAN Part II - the 21 foot jumper! - Simon Shack

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=501&p=2389314#p2389314

    People (or at least the leaders of the people) have to learn a few simple (but elusive precisely because simple) things:

    1) That they are manipulated mainly through FEAR and that the majority of the alternative media wittingly or unwittingly also pushes the fear-meme on millions of people, therefore leaving them susceptible to manipulation from manufactured trauma, one sort for the average dupes, another for the niche market of ‘info-warriors’ and rebels of the same root source.

    2) That IMAGES cannot be trusted to be representations of real events PRIOR to authentication, especially if these images have been transmitted to you by the biggest liars and fraudsters in the history of the world: the mass-media. If you think your eyes alone are reliable to process faked imagery consider this batch:

    http://www.viralnova.com/time-traveling-photographer/

    3) All the more-or-less true and smaller ‘confirmable’ news events that the media reports are only buttering you up and gaining your con-fidence for the one big FALSE one that they really need you to swallow (without insisting on independent confirmation) in order for their string-pullers behind the scenes to maintain their rule through trauma-induced fear-based conditioning.

    Know how a con-artist operates: a few truths followed by a lie that poisons that well and most important of all: extend this distrust to imagery even if that might short-circuit the ecstatic joys of conspiracy hobbyism or more accurately “movie criticism” and interpretation by solving the case too soon (god forbid!).

    4) That a ‘death’ transmitted to you as a real life event by the biggest liars and fraudsters in history is NEVER a death until YOU and/or a representative of yours in whom you place 100% trust can examine the actual corpse and confirm it. When your mother or cousin dies, you can confirm it. When the kid down the street goes to Iraq and dies in a shoot-out or comes back PTSD’d and crazy, you can confirm it. When somebody dies on a TV news report, you should never take their word for it and absent the ability to confirm, never bite on the fear-acid they want you to trip on. Laugh and ridicule them and make them WORK for their social engineering by actually having to go out and massacre real people. This way they end up directly liable as murderers (directly where the false-flag occurred, as well as indirectly overseas in wars started as a result) in addition to being exposed as shameless uber-fraudsters.


    -- Negentropic MK III

    ReplyDelete
  5. To prevent misquotes and things they never wrote being spread and the putting of words in their mouths never said, here are Simon Shack and Hoi Polloi's actual opinions on the Jews:

    Shack:

    “It just appears evident to me that the “Nutwork” (aka the “elite”) responsible for all the ugly going-ons in this world is an eclectic lot. Of course “elite” Jews/Zionists are involved (seemingly in a major way), of course “elite” Brits and “elite” Yankees are involved. Of course “elite” Italians, Frenchmen, Irishmen, Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Estonians, Sicilians, Vaticanians, Swiss, Luxemburgians, Maltese, Spaniards, Germans, Turks, Russians, Serbs, Saudis, Egyptians, Nigerians, South Africans, Burmese, Japanese, Chinese (etc – you name it – don’t blame me for skipping some ) are involved.

    IMHO, we (the normal, average folks) are just wasting our time pointing our fingers at any single, particular ethnicity of this global elite plague.

    Having said the above, I’m certainly not oblivious of the prominence/hegemony of the jew-factor in world politics/media & propaganda. As you may know, I’m half Norwegian (from a father with centuries of Norwegian ancestors) & half Swedish(from a mother with centuries of Swedish ancestors). A total Scandinavian entity, if you will – and to be sure, with zero jewish origins. See, a funny thought occured to me a few years back – as I realized that Norway and Sweden add up to a total of about 13 million of this planet’s inhabitants. Apparently, the Jewish people also add up to a total of 13 million of this planet’s inhabitants.

    Now, what if 90% of the American (and European) News Media Corporations were owned / controlled by Norwegians and Swedes?

    Wouldn’t that make the rest of this planet’s inhabitants raise an eyebrow?”

    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1246&p=2374765&hilit=Wouldn%27t+that+make+the+rest+of+this+planet%27s+inhabitants#p2374765

    That’s basically his diplomatic way of saying: look I know it’s these friggin Jews at the top pulling the levers for the rest but I have to be accurate, scientific & thoroughly researched about it, so I won’t get thrown in with loudmouth idiots like Prostink
    .
    Hoi Polloi, Shack’s second-in-command, a somewhat contradictory character who’s a comic-book-artist/communitarian activist in real life and was involved with some bizarre shenanigans on the forum with some members he accused of being ‘sims’ whom he banned without proof and refused to reinstate when proof was offered, went even further recently.

    At around the 2 hour 18 minute mark of the following audio hoi polloi aka Max Konrardy tells Abirato that it can easily be proven that it’s the Jews behind most institutions running PsyOps including not just the mass-media but “army intelligence” & not only that but it’s also Jews behind most of the violence on the planet & it’s just a fact that people should face & deal with even if it’s also not the only issue:

    http://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ep96-columjaddica-and-hoi.mp3


    ~ Negentropic MK IV

    ReplyDelete
  6. The holohoax and 9-11 media-fakery analogy is spot on. I wrote about this on JF's own blog in 2012. Here's an updated version:

    Neither event 'happened' in the way that people were told they 'happened.'

    Between 100,000 to 250,000 people of all types and not just Jews died in the holohoax from typhus, starvation, malnutrition & all other causes caused by allied bombing of the supply lines and not by any deliberate extermination plan.

    That's why it's a hoax, not because there were no deaths or 'nothing happened.' Plenty of things happened, just not the main hoax of 'planned extermination in death camps' that was claimed by black propaganda.

    The central instrument of murder in that hoax was claimed to have been 'execution gas chambers.'

    These were 100% proven from multiple sources to not have existed at all. What existed were delousing chambers to actually prevent people from contacting typhus and dying.

    What 'happened' on 9-11 is that the entire complex of the World Trade Center was demolished. To be precise: 9 buildings in all were destroyed but only 8 fully demolished on 9-11 itself (7 in the WTC complex itself, 2 more slightly outside, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church and Deutsche Bank on Liberty Street. The bank was the only building destroyed but not fully demolished until 2008).

    That's all that happened as far as any 'attacks' go because you can go to New York & see that the buildings are not there, not because you saw it on TV.

    Everything else is a lie, including the deaths of 3000 'victims.' There are only 249 death certificates on file and not even one of those death certificates has a last address of record or autopsy on file. We don't even know where even these 249 lived the day they supposedly died. Not only that but since most of the victims are obvious manufactured simulations

    http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims.htm

    it follows that it would not make sense to both simulate victims and have real ones or two contradictory modus operandi operating at the same time, since the benefits of one cancel out the risks of the other. If you're going to kill victims why would you also fake them and if you were going to faking them what possible purpose could also killing them serve except to get real grieving and vindictive families on your back you don't need?

    ~ Negentropic MK V

    ReplyDelete
  7. (continued from previous post)

    The central instrument of murder in the 9-11 hoax is claimed to be planes flown into buildings & one that crashed in a field.

    They claim that the people who died were either in the planes or were trapped in the buildings above where the planes hit & could not be rescued or escape in time before the buildings were demolished.

    It is 100% proven from multiple sources that there were no such planes used at any of the four 9-11 crash sites.

    Official 9-11 timeline:

    8:46:30[10] Flight 11 crashes at roughly 466 mph (790 km/h or 219 m/s or 425 knots) into the north face of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the World Trade Center, between floors 93 and 99.

    9:03:02: Flight 175 crashes at about 590 mph (950 km/h, 264 m/s or 513 knots) into the south face of the South Tower (2 WTC) of the World Trade Center, between floors 77 and 85

    9:37:46: Flight 77 crashes into the western side of the Pentagon at 530 mph (853 km/h, 237 m/s, or 460 knots) and starts a violent fire

    9:58:59:[10] The South Tower of the World Trade Center collapses, 56 minutes after the impact of Flight 175.

    10:03:11: United Airlines Flight 93 is crashed by its hijackers and passengers at 583 mph (926 km/h, 272 m/s, or 509 knots), due to fighting in the cockpit 80 miles (129 km) southeast of Pittsburgh in Somerset County, Pennsylvania

    10:28:22:[10] The North Tower of the World Trade Center collapses.

    5:20:33: 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building, collapses.


    Since there weren't any planes, nothing but bombs or instant demolition without warning could have trapped enough people in the buildings to kill 3000 or to kill even one person. But, according to their own timeline and story, it was the planes, not bombs that caused the damage and the people that supposedly died were trapped for 56 minutes without rescue (or a single cough on the recorded calls! lol) and some 200 so desperate they jumped to their deaths!

    Of course, of the these supposed 200, we have only a few shots and no bodies or autopsies and instead videos of KING KONG MEN of up to 21 feet in length! lol

    Can it get any more ridiculous than this?


    ~ Negentropic MK VI

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lee Rogers - Another agent or useful ego/idiot pushing the 9-11 planes and bashing Shack without the least bit of proper inquiry and worst-of-all giving as links to his new-found source of valid info non other than, are you ready for this, don't laugh, douchebag Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer (LOL, sorry, I couldn't help it):

    http://www.dailyslave.com/the-insanity-of-the-everything-is-a-hoax-conspiracy-crowd/

    When will this shit ever end?

    Will somebody get Lee Rogers on a radio show and set his ass straight. Supporting the outright scroundelisms of Anglin, for fuck's sake? What the hell is wrong with this guy? The fact that he even mentions his old pal Celtic Rebel's good buddy Dallas Goldbug with regard to his BS "They are saying everything is fake" thesis shows how little he knows.

    I suspect this guy of having been a plant from the beginning. Ever wonder how he never loses that lucrative job of his that sends him all over the globe? Well, now you know why. I could care less how many Jews he names when he does this kind of shilling on the back end of it.


    ~ Negentropic MK VII

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rogers says: "It is one thing if it is easy and simple to prove that something is a hoax like the Jew Holocaust fables of soap and lampshades but entirely different when dealing with an event like the 9/11 attacks."

    And how is it "entirely different" Mr. Rogers? Can you please explain that non-sequitur to us? What's so special about the 9-11 "attacks" (who attacked who except on TV for one thing?) that makes it an impregnable puzzle to the average folks you claim to want to reach in large numbers? In fact, the plane-fakery is far easier to prove with a few images to the average person who is not demoralized to the point where facts make no difference to him than the soap-lampshade BS on the holohoax.

    An argument for scoundrelism, dishonesty and the ends-justify-the-means is all that Mr. Rogers' impassioned support of Mr. Anglin's ignorance represents.


    ~ Negentropic MK VIII

    ReplyDelete